Jones v Gibbs and Knight (Attorney General Intervening)
| Jurisdiction | Grenada |
| Date | 1968 |
| Year | 1968 |
| Court | High Court (Grenada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Christie (in His Capacity as Leader of the Opposition) v Ingraham (in His Capacity as Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas)
...in support the decision of the Glasgow J in the High Court of Grenada, in Jones v Gibbs and Knight (the Attorney General intervening) (1968) 12 W.I.R. 311, who was satisfied that the applicant before him had been validly appointed to the Senate but “owing to the restricted jurisdiction whic......
-
Esquivel v Usher
...out in paragraph (a) to (c) of Article 86(1). In support of this contention, counsel referred to the case of Jones v. Gibbs & Knight (1968) 12 W.I.R. 311. 11 In replying on this ground, counsel for the respondent submitted that the rationale for Jones v. Gibbs & Knight (supra) cannot be asc......
-
Esquivel v Usher
...out in paragraph (a) to (c) of Article 86(1). In support of this contention, counsel referred to the case of Jones v. Gibbs & KNIGHT (1968) 12 W.I.R. 311. 11In replying on this ground, counsel for the respondent submitted that the rationale for Jones v. Gibbs & KNIGHT (supra) cannot be asc......